分类: apple

apple

  • Apple 17 vs Apple 16: Comprehensive Upgrade or Minor Improvement?

    The new phones launched by Apple every year always attract the attention of technology enthusiasts around the world. In 2025, the Apple 17 was officially released, and as the successor to the Apple 16, it underwent upgrades in multiple aspects. So, what are the significant improvements of Apple 17 compared to Apple 16? Is it worth upgrading for users? This article will comprehensively compare the Apple 17 and Apple 16 in terms of design, performance, imaging, battery life, and functionality.
    silvanita.com
    1、 Exterior Design: Detail Optimization and Material Upgrade
    Apple 16: The Apple 16 features aluminum alloy bezels and ceramic shield panels, with a design language that continues the style of the Apple 15. The screen bezels are relatively narrow, but there are still some “black borders” present. The physical button design is still retained, and the overall feel is excellent.
    Apple 17: The Apple 17 goes further in design by using titanium alloy material, making the body lighter and more durable. At the same time, the screen borders are further narrowed, almost achieving a “borderless” effect. In addition, the Apple 17 has removed physical buttons and replaced them with tactile feedback buttons, enhancing the aesthetic appeal of the integrated design.
    Comparative summary: The Apple 17 has a more futuristic feel in terms of materials and design details, especially the design without physical buttons makes it appear more avant-garde.
    2、 Performance: The powerful performance of A19 biomimetic chip
    Apple 16: Equipped with A18 biomimetic chip, manufactured based on 4-nanometer technology, it has strong performance and can smoothly run various large-scale applications and games.
    Apple 17: Upgraded to A19 biomimetic chip, using a 3-nanometer process, with a performance improvement of about 20% and energy efficiency improvement of about 30%. It performs better in multitasking, AI computing, and graphics rendering.
    Comparative summary: Although the A18 is already powerful enough, the performance and energy efficiency of the A19 have been further improved, especially in high-intensity tasks and battery life, with the Apple 17 outperforming.
    3、 Imaging System: From Excellence to Excellence
    Apple 16: Rear triple camera system, including a 48 megapixel main camera, a 12 megapixel ultra wide angle lens, and a 3x optical zoom telephoto lens, supporting 4K video recording and night mode.
    Apple 17: The rear triple camera system has been fully upgraded, with the main camera increased to 50 million pixels, the ultra wide angle lens upgraded to 48 million pixels, and the addition of a 120x periscope zoom function. In addition, Apple 17 has introduced light field photography technology to support the adjustment of focus and depth of field after shooting.
    Comparative summary: The imaging system of Apple 17 surpasses Apple 16 in terms of pixels, zoom capability, and innovative features, especially in light field photography technology, providing users with more creative possibilities.
    4、 Battery life and charging: faster and longer lasting
    Apple 16: Equipped with approximately 3200mAh battery, supporting 27W wired fast charging and 15W MagSafe wireless charging, the battery life performance is average.
    Apple 17: The battery capacity has been further improved, and thanks to the energy efficiency optimization of the A19 chip, the battery life has been extended by about 20% compared to the Apple 16. The charging speed has also been greatly improved, supporting 100W wired fast charging and 50W wireless fast charging, and can be charged to 80% in 20 minutes.
    Comparative summary: The Apple 17 has achieved significant improvements in battery life and charging speed, especially with the upgrade of fast charging technology, making daily use more convenient for users.
    5、 Function and System: Integration of Intelligence and Ecology
    Apple 16: Running on iOS 18 system, supporting dynamic island, real-time activities and other functions, the ecological experience is still excellent.
    Apple 17: Pre installed with the brand new iOS 19 system, adding more AI driven intelligent features such as a more precise voice assistant and smarter photo editing capabilities. In addition, the Apple 17 supports seamless connection with Vision Pro devices, and through the VisionOS Lite feature, users can directly control AR/VR devices with their phones.
    Comparative summary: The Apple 17 has gone further in terms of intelligence and ecological integration, especially the linkage function with Vision Pro, which brings users a brand new interactive experience.
    6、 Price Comparison: The Cost of Upgrading
    Apple 16: The starting price is 7999 yuan (128GB version), and the highest price is 11999 yuan (1TB version).
    Apple 17: The starting price is 8999 yuan (128GB version), and the highest price is 13999 yuan (2TB version).
    Comparative summary: The starting price of Apple 17 is 1000 yuan higher than that of Apple 16, but considering the comprehensive upgrades in materials, performance, imaging, and functionality, this price difference is acceptable.
    7、 Is it worth upgrading?
    Suitable for users upgrading to Apple 17:
    There are higher requirements for mobile photography, especially for stronger zoom capabilities and light field photography functions.
    I hope to experience faster charging speed and longer battery life.
    I am interested in cutting-edge design and enjoy non physical buttons and titanium alloy materials.
    More powerful performance is needed to support high-intensity tasks or future application scenarios.
    Users who can continue to use Apple 16:
    The demand for mobile phone performance and imaging system is not high, and the performance of Apple 16 is already sufficient for daily use.
    There is no strong demand for new features such as light field photography and VisionoS Lite.
    I hope to save the budget and temporarily do not consider replacing the equipment.
    Summary: The Comprehensive Evolution of Apple 17
    Compared to the Apple 16, the Apple 17 has achieved significant upgrades in design, performance, imaging, battery life, and functionality, especially in breakthroughs in imaging systems and fast charging technology, which is impressive. However, the Apple 16 remains a flagship phone with powerful performance and excellent user experience. If you pursue the ultimate technological experience, the Apple 17 is undoubtedly a choice worth upgrading to; But if you don’t have a high demand for new features, the Apple 16 can still accompany you through a pleasant period of use.

  • Why doesn’t Apple make cars? Decisively disbanding the car making team, Cook seems to have discovered something

    picture
    When Tesla’s super factory rises up in the Texas desert, traditional car giants are betting on electrification transformation, and technology giants such as Huawei and Xiaomi enter the intelligent car race with high profile, a confusing phenomenon continues to spark discussion: as the world’s most valuable technology giant, why did Apple decisively dissolve its car making team and abandon its car making plan? Cook seems to have discovered something.
    In the past decade, rumors about Apple cars have never stopped, but apart from the continuous iteration of the CarPlay in car system, consumers have never been able to wait for that smart car with the glowing Apple logo. This decade long car making puzzle reflects the deep game between the technology industry and the automotive industry in the era of deep integration.
    picture
    strategic focus
    Apple’s business empire has always adhered to the product philosophy of “extreme simplicity”. Unlike other tech giants who like to tinker around, Apple during the Tim Cook era maintained astonishing strategic determination: launching only a few core products each year, yet accounting for over 85% of the global consumer electronics industry’s profits. This strategic focus on car manufacturing is reflected in rigorous cost-benefit calculations.
    The marginal effect of product matrix: iPhone, as a cash cow, contributed over $200 billion in revenue last year, while the ecosystem formed by Mac, iPad, AirPods, and others has built a deep enough moat. As a heavy asset, long-term, and low gross profit industry, the cost-effectiveness of automobiles poses a challenge to Apple’s existing business model.
    Cannot accept imperfect products
    Apple’s car making ambition has never stopped at producing an ordinary electric vehicle. Its initial goal is to build a fully autonomous vehicle “without steering wheel and brake pedal”, and even envisage “zero intervention driving” through Siri voice control. However, this vision is impossible to achieve in the short term. In addition, the perfectionist Apple company cannot accept imperfect products being launched into the market.
    In the game between tech giants and traditional car companies, time dimension becomes a key variable. The mature “vertical integration+global OEM” model in the consumer electronics field has completely failed in the automotive industry. The automotive supply chain involves over 20000 components, with a certification period of 3-5 years. While Apple is still struggling with whether to invest billions of dollars in building a factory, the automotive industry is evolving at an unimaginable speed.
    picture
    Apple’s retreat is essentially a precise business calculation: when investing over $10 billion in ten years but still seeing no hope of mass production, timely stop loss is more important than idealism. Currently, Apple is focusing on AI and AR, transforming its advantages in consumer electronics into an enabler of the automotive industry, and still holds a significant number of automotive related patents. Since the launch of CarPlay, Apple has been trying to expand the iOS ecosystem into the automotive industry. By holding patents for in car interaction and AR navigation, Apple can further enhance the functionality of CarPlay and even potentially develop the next generation of in car operating systems.
    External comments: In the century long transformation of smart cars, Apple’s caution and patience are in stark contrast to its radical innovation in the field of consumer electronics. Behind this strategic choice is not only a clear understanding of the particularity of the automotive industry, but also a precise grasp of its own advantages. While the industry is still debating when Apple cars will be born, this tech giant may be reshaping the future of the automotive industry in another way. Some Silicon Valley analysts say that Apple never really wanted to make cars, they were just looking for the next iPhone.

  • IPhone 16e disassembly shows internal structure, Apple C1 chip power consumption and signal test results

    The latest iPhone 16e launched by Apple has been released, and due to its very similar appearance to the iPhone 14, many consumers believe that this is Apple’s “clearance of inventory” product. However, disassembly shows that although the iPhone 16e retains the shadow of the old model in terms of appearance, its internal structure has been specially designed, rather than simply stacking inventory components.
    The YouTube channel REWA Technology shared a disassembly video of the iPhone 16e. From this, it can be seen that the iPhone 16e adopts many technologies from the iPhone 15 and iPhone 16, and has been optimized accordingly.
    Firstly, the disassembly method of iPhone 16e is similar to that of iPhone 15, requiring it to be disassembled from the back panel instead of the front screen as in the past. This design facilitates maintenance and backplate replacement, enhancing the repairability of the equipment.
    Compared to its predecessor, the iPhone 16e is equipped with a 48 megapixel single camera lens, which frees up internal space and allows for a larger capacity battery.
    Disassembly shows that the capacity of this battery is 4005mAh, which is about 10% higher than the 3561mAh of iPhone 16. The increase in battery capacity is actually the main reason why the iPhone 16e has become Apple’s current 6.1-inch longest lasting model.
    It is worth noting that the battery removal method of iPhone 16e has also been upgraded, using electrically induced adhesive release technology to improve the convenience of battery replacement.
    The disassembly also revealed the A18 chip on the iPhone 16e, but this chip uses a 4-core GPU.
    At the same time, the motherboard is designed with a double-layer structure, which integrates Apple’s first self-developed modem chip – Apple C1.
    The Apple C1 chip adopts 4nm baseband technology and 7nm RF technology, and Apple claims that it has lower power consumption performance. However, many users are more concerned about whether this chip can significantly improve the signal performance of the iPhone.
    At present, domestic and foreign media have tested the signal performance of iPhone 16e, including Tom’s Guide, The Verge, as well as domestic reviews such as Phoenix Home and Geek Bay. From the test results, the cellular network speed of iPhone 16e is basically equivalent to that of iPhone 16, but the signal performance is slightly inferior and has not brought significant improvement.
    However, tests conducted by Geek Bay have shown that the power consumption of the Apple C1 is indeed lower in different signal environments, which is in line with Apple’s promotion of low power consumption. This optimization is undoubtedly one of the factors that enable the iPhone 16e to achieve longer battery life.
    From the disassembly, it can be seen that the internal design of iPhone 16e integrates some technologies of iPhone 15 and iPhone 16, and is not simply a “clearance” product. But in order to control costs, Apple still has some reuse of certain components, such as the screen being completely identical to the iPhone 14.
    However, if some users expect significant improvement in signal performance for the Apple C1, they may feel disappointed. As Apple’s first generation self-developed modem chip, the biggest highlight of the Apple C1 is its low power consumption, laying the foundation for future improvements.
    Perhaps we can expect that the next generation of Apple C2 chips, combined with optimized antenna design, can truly achieve breakthroughs in signal on future iPhones

  • Apple stops signing iOS 18.4, upgraded iPhone users can no longer downgrade

    IT Home reported on April 24th that Apple has stopped signing up for iOS 18.4 one week after releasing the iOS 18.4.1 update, and iPhone users who upgrade to iOS 18.4.1 cannot downgrade back to iOS 18.4.
    IT Home has learned that the iOS 18.4.1 update provides important bug fixes and security updates, and resolves rare issues that cause wireless CarPlay in some vehicles to fail to connect.
    IOS 18.4 was released on April 1st, and this update includes the Apple Vision Pro app, new Apple Intelligence features and language support for notifications, recipe functionality for Apple News+subscribers, and feature optimizations for multiple photo apps.
    Apple will periodically stop signing older versions of iOS, usually within one or two weeks after the release of a new version. When Apple stops signing updates, due to server-side software verification checks, the update will no longer be able to be installed on iPhone, so users who have already updated to the latest version of iOS cannot downgrade.

  • It is reported that the search bar for Apple iOS 19 applications will be moved to the bottom of the screen for easy operation on large screen iPhones

    IT Home reported on April 22nd that with less than two months left until this year’s Apple Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC), iOS 19 is about to unveil its mysterious veil. Recent rumors suggest that iOS 19 will bring an improvement specifically designed for large screen iPhone users – a change in the position of the in app search bar. It is reported that the search bar for Apple iOS 19 applications will be moved to the bottom of the screen for easy operation on large screen iPhones
    It is reported that the search bar for Apple iOS 19 applications will be moved to the bottom of the screen for easy operation on large screen iPhones
    IT Home noticed that in iOS 18, the standard search bar within the app is usually located at the top of the screen, which often requires users to stretch their fingers to reach it when using a large screen iPhone. Taking the iPhone 16 Pro as an example, even users with larger hands can only barely reach the search bar with their thumb. With the release of the iPhone 17 Air, its screen size has further increased, coupled with the large screen design of the iPhone Pro Max itself. When using the current iOS design, users often need to operate with both hands to conveniently use the search function.
    However, according to tech blogger Jon Prosser, iOS 19 will adjust the position of the search bar within the app. It is reported that iOS 19 will move the search bar within the app to the bottom of the screen, which will enable users to operate more naturally with their thumbs. Prosser demonstrated the simulation effect of this change in its latest video, taking the Messages application as an example. Currently, the search bar of the application is located at the top and needs to be pulled down to display; In iOS 19, the search bar will always be visible and located at the bottom of the screen, making it convenient for users to use at any time. It is reported that the search bar for Apple iOS 19 applications will be moved to the bottom of the screen for easy operation on large screen iPhones
    It is reported that the search bar for Apple iOS 19 applications will be moved to the bottom of the screen for easy operation on large screen iPhones
    In addition, Prosser also presented simulation images of apps with bottom tab bars such as Music and App Store, as well as simulation images of information apps without bottom tab bars, indicating that this change seems to apply to all apps, regardless of whether they already have a bottom tab bar.
    The last major iOS interface design update by Apple was before the significant increase in iPhone screen size. Nowadays, with the popularity of large screen iPhones, users’ demand for operational convenience is also increasing. I hope iOS 19 can bring more improvements like moving the search bar to the bottom, providing a better user experience for large screen iPhone users.
    share
    more
    IT Home Focus
    238.4K followers
    It is reported that the search bar for Apple iOS 19 applications will be moved to the bottom of the screen for easy operation on large screen iPhones

  • Suddenly, 3 new Apple phones are exposed!

    Although Apple has not yet released a foldable screen device, it is actually quietly preparing for the first foldable screen iPhone, foldable screen iPad, foldable screen Mac and other products. And Apple is already laying the groundwork for these foldable screen products. Although the actual machine has not been released yet, based on the latest exposure of Apple’s operating system, targeted layout has been made. According to Bloomberg reporter Mark Gurman, WWDC2025 held in June this year will not only launch iOS 19, but also iPadOS 19 will officially debut. And this time iPadOS 19 is closer to MacBook in terms of operating experience, with comprehensive multitasking capabilities, and even has the ability to replace MacBook to a certain extent. Foreign media 9to5Mac is more radical, believing that Apple’s move is aimed at creating three new Apple phones, namely the foldable screen iPhone, foldable screen iPad, and foldable screen Mac mentioned by Jige earlier. You should know that Apple’s first iPad was released on January 27, 2010. Although it was released later than the iPhone and Mac, it is not intended to replace these two Apple devices. As an independent Apple device, the iPad was mainly designed to supplement the shortcomings of the iPhone’s small screen, so early iPads and iPhones used the same iOS operating system. Until 2019, Apple also launched its first iPadOS, an operating system specifically designed for iPad, completely separate from iOS. This is all because the iPad is occupying an increasingly important position in Apple’s product line, and this year’s iPadOS will usher in an epic upgrade, where multitasking processors and cross platform operations need to be coordinated to make device switching smoother for users. The folding screen iPhone, folding screen iPad, folding screen MacBook and other products have similar forms, and Apple must consider the UI interface and operating experience after unfolding the folding screen. That’s how to switch apps more intuitively and conveniently through a large screen experience, making it easier for Apple fans to get started. In addition, all Apple applications need to be adapted to different forms of foldable screen devices. For example, if the folded iPhone screen size is 7.8 inches, multiple window conventions and application switching experiences need to be added to the iOS series interface. The same application, when switching from a foldable iPhone to an 18.8-inch foldable iPad, not only requires synchronized interface switching, but even the UI interface needs to be immediately adapted. The switching process needs to be very smooth, and even on larger foldable MacBook devices, a similar adaptation interface is required. And the iPad OS is responsible for this task. Ji Ge believes that in the future, Apple will pay more attention to the consistent experience of various products, so we will see that iPadOS will affect the design of iOS and MacOS. According to Mark Gulman’s latest revelation, the foldable iPhone is expected to be released as early as the end of 2026, the foldable iPad may have to wait until 2027, and the foldable MacBook may be even later, probably until 2028. The truly epic update will start with the foldable iPhone. It is expected that the internal screen of the foldable iPhone will be based on iPadOS, while the external screen will be based on iOS. The presentation of the application interface will be different, but the switching will be smoother.

  • Apple announces environmental progress: the company’s global greenhouse gas emissions have decreased by over 60% compared to 2015

    On the eve of Earth Day on April 17th, Apple announced significant progress towards its 2030 environmental goals: the company’s global greenhouse gas emissions have decreased by over 60% compared to the 2015 baseline. The company has achieved multiple environmental milestones simultaneously: using 99% recycled rare earth elements in all magnets and 99% recycled cobalt materials in all Apple designed batteries.
    Apple’s 2030 strategy aims to prioritize achieving a 75% reduction in emissions compared to 2015, and then balance the remaining emissions through high-quality carbon offset projects. Last year, through comprehensive measures such as shifting the supply chain towards renewable electricity and increasing the proportion of recycled materials in products, Apple successfully avoided approximately 41 million tons of greenhouse gas emissions.
    Apple stated that from now until May 16th, users can go to the store to recycle their devices and enjoy special discounts. (Zhou Ling, reporter from The Paper)

  • Apple iOS 19 message application first exposed: dark blue luminous button + rounded keyboard

    IT Home News on March 26, source Jon Prosser released a video yesterday (March 25) showing the simulation design of Messages in Apple iOS 19. The interface continues the existing layout, but the details are integrated into vis. The ionOS style indicates that Apple may promote the unification of cross-platform design.

    In terms of visual design, the back button, message list button and FaceTime button on the navigation bar adopt a dark blue luminous effect, and the rounded corners of the keyboard and the input box are more obvious. The translucent elements and rounded corner buttons are inspired by visionOS, which is consistent with the revised style of the Camera application that was exposed earlier. IT Home attaches the relevant screenshots as follows:

    Prosser said that the design drawing was based on the iOS 19 code recovery provided by an anonymous source, not a direct screenshot. He announced that he would release more iOS 19 design videos in the future.

    Prosser said that the design drawing was based on the iOS 19 code recovery provided by an anonymous source, not a direct screenshot. He announced that he would release more iOS 19 design videos in the future. Prosser said that the design drawing was based on the iOS 19 code recovery provided by an anonymous source, not a direct screenshot. He announced that he would release more iOS 19 design videos in the future.

    Bloomberg Mark Gurman once revealed that iOS 19 / macOS Sequoia 16 will fully adopt visionOS design elements to achieve cross-system consistency.

  • Apple’s six-sided screen iPhone patent exposed: all-glass design, appearance subversion

    As we all know, the front of the traditional touch device adopts a glass cover, but the six-sided screen iPhone shell described by Apple’s new patent is all made of glass, including the side and back. Although the device is made of multiple pieces of glass, it looks like a whole piece of glass, subverting the existing iPh. One form.

    Thanks to the all-glass body design, the side and back of the six-screen iPhone can also display content, and the side and back will also be equipped with touch and pressure sensing systems, so as to achieve “full interaction”.

    Not only that, when the user flips the mobile phone, the display content will also intelligently follow the user’s perspective and automatically jump to the other side. And this device is also equipped with a pressure sensing device, which can adjust the height of the volume button when the user presses the side.

    It is worth noting that the patents exposed this time also include Mac and Apple Watch. The relevant patents show that the shells of these two devices are made of glass, and the whole is transparent.

  • iPhone 16e actual test: performance images are all available, and the battery life signal is a surprise! | Evaluation of Huangjia

    It is said that the price of the iPhone 16e is too high, and it will start from 3,999 after the national supplement. After a search, I found that the new iPhone 15 only starts from 4,999 after the national supplement, and the price difference is negligible, but one has a dual camera, one has AI in the plan; one has a flexible island, and the other has an A18 processor. If you happen to have an iPhone in your hand, how should you choose?

    In this episode of the program, let’s talk about whether this 16e is worth buying compared with the iPhone 16 of the same series and the iPhone 15 with a similar price.

    Click here to watch the video

    Outward appearance

    First of all, in terms of appearance, the iPhone 16e weighs 167 grams and is 7.8 mm thick, which is lighter than 15 and 16. This weight range is also quite friendly to the little thumb. When it comes to the frame, the iPhone 16e is equipped with an additional operation button compared with the iPhone 15, but it lacks a camera control button compared with the iPhone 16. Although the level is strict and the knife is accurate, the future visual recognition AI will start quickly, and the press conference said that the operation button can be used.

    As a model that replaces the iPhone SE, the biggest changes that can be perceived without turning on the iPhone 16e are three points. The National Bank of China has upgraded the dual SIM slot, a more convenient USB-C interface, and Face ID. The level is still strict and has not been on the island, but the narrow bangs scheme that has been optimized before has been used. The actual test Face ID module has not been castrated. It supports horizontal unlocking, and cannot lie down and cannot recognize human faces.

    In addition to the flexible island, the front frame will also be thicker. Let’s open the big mirror to compare, it’s about this level! The screen was also replaced with 60Hz OLED. The eye protector felt that they were going blind, but the display effect was indeed improved by leaps compared with LCD. 16e also supports original color display and HDR, but it is basically the same as the screen of iPhone 14 in terms of hardware quality. The maximum brightness is reduced from 1000 nits of 15 and 16 to 800 nits, and the brightness of HDR display is also reduced from 1600 nits to 1200 nits. At the same time, it does not have Yang The excitation brightness under light, the Cook knife method is complex.

    When it comes to the back, the 16e in my hand is a white frosted glass back panel. The design of the back cover is quite simple. The design of the single camera will not interfere with the fingers when holding it, and it can’t touch the steps of the camera at all. Those users who say every day that they can give me a camera scan the code, it is recommended to buy it as soon as possible. But what I didn’t expect was that there was also a knife on the back, and he also castrated a Magsafe with thick eyebrows and big eyes that was harmless to humans and animals. Really, the cook, you… A few iron suction stones are not spared. For users who want to decorate their mobile phones with magnetic suction, or those who need in-car magnetic suction, they have to rely on three-party mobile phone cases in the future.

    Finally, in terms of color selection, this year’s 16e only has black and white, either with a case, or look at iPhone 15 and iPhone 16.

    Natural capacity

    After reading the design of the appearance, let’s take a look at the biggest competitiveness of the iPhone 16e compared with the iPhone 15, the A18 chip. However, taking you to review the press conference, this A18 was also cut from a 5-core GPU to a 4-core GPU.

    In the CPU test of GeekBench 6, the results of single-core 3124 and multi-core 8005 were scored. Compared with the A18 running score on 16, there was no obvious difference. Compared with the A16 on 15, the single-core improved by 19.4% and the multi-core improved by 25.2%, which is a cross-generation upgrade.

    In the GPU test, first of all, GFX Bench 1440P Aztec Ruins Metal running score, the A18 on 16e scored 2995, compared with the standard version of A18 running score of 3807 points, which is about 21.3% lower, which happens to be one core less. The level of heart can’t even run over the 5-core A16 on the iPhone 15.

    In the cross-platform 3D Mark Steel Nomad Light and the Solar Bay test of light light chasing, this A18 ran 1,321 points and 5878 points respectively. Compared with the full-blooded A18, the reduction was 22% and 13% respectively, and also It belongs to the normal level of cutting a core. Compared with A16, the A18 also has a gap of several points in terms of SNL’s running score, but the A18, which is only held in Solar Bay, can still run faster than the A16 with pure GPU calculation.

    Therefore, judging from the overall running score, a knife on the core scale will still weaken a large part of the performance. Is the game performance of this A18 knife version not good?

    Judging from the actual test, the answer is yes, even worse than iPhone 15. We tested the 30-minute original god 3.0 running map, and the high-quality running map of the higher-load Star Iron Golden Moment.

    Here, the iPhone 16e has an average frame rate of 58.3, a fluctuation of 7.8, and an average power consumption of 4.27 watts in Genshin. The highest temperature on the front is 44.9 and 46.7 degrees on the back. Compared with the previously tested iPhone 16 and 15, the frame rate, power consumption and heat dissipation performance are all Fixed gap.

    In the Star Iron Run Chart, the average frame rate of iPhone 16e is 56.7, the fluctuation is 21.4, and the average power consumption is 4.58 watts, with a maximum of 42.5 degrees on the front and 45.4 degrees on the back. Such a frame rate curve performance is a little unstable enough. Compared with the iPhone 16 and i with heat dissipation support Phone 15, the game performance is not excellent, but this is also in our expectation. The lack of a GPU is indeed a hard injury.

    Therefore, this A18 can be viewed in this way. The stronger CPU may be smoother than the iPhone 15 over time in the longer replacement cycle in the future, but the peak performance and gaming ability are strictly limited at the beginning. I think Apple’s intention is also very clear. Our iPhone 16 games are better. Go and buy them.

    However! Although the A18 is directly disabled, this time Apple has broken through the Qualcomm card neck on the baseband, equipped with the first self-developed C1 baseband chip. As a common problem of poor iPhone signal, can the support of C1 bring progress?

    In the past two days, we have also tested its 5G network performance. In terms of 5G peak download speed, in the scenario where our office signal is not good, the average peak of the telecom N78 network is 450.8Mbps, the radio and television N41 network is 340.4Mbps, and the outside environment is 67 respectively. 2.6 megabytes per second and 704 megabytes per second.

    Compared with the iPhone 16 with Qualcomm’s baseband, the average telecommunications in the same indoor environment is 427.3Mbps, the radio and television is 406.9Mbps, and the average telecommunications in the outdoor environment is 712.5Mbps, and the radio and television is 736.3Mbps. At present, the downside peak of the two devices has not been significantly increased. The difference.

    At the same time, for the signal strength, we also recorded tests in offices, office building elevators, basements and outdoor environments respectively. Under the telecommunications and radio and television networks, the iPhone signal strength of the four scenarios, at present, the iPhone 16 is stronger in our usage environment, but this does depend on the impact of the environment, operator and base station, and our results are only for our test this time.

    Did Apple develop a loneliness by itself? No, the power consumption performance of this baseband is very surprising. The actual test of the power consumption of 5G network download Genshinde’s complete 28G data packets. Here, the power consumption of iPhone 16e is 28%, compared with 37% of the power consumption of iPhone 16 and 41% of the power consumption of iPhone 15, the overall power consumption performance Compared with Qualcomm’s baseband, it has been greatly improved, and the use under the cellular network will also save more power.

    However, if you are interested in this baseband and want more accurate data, we can also arrange to go to the laboratory for testing in the future and add a little to it. Remember to pay attention to Huangjia’s evaluation. If you want to see it, you can like it!

    Another key upgrade of the 16e this time is the battery life. It is tested with the battery life of the death model evaluated by Huangjia. The battery life of the iPhone 16e is 8 hours and 14 minutes, ranking 80th in the ranking list. Compared with the 7 hours and 8 minutes of the iPhone 16 and the 6 hours and 33 minutes of the 15, This battery life improvement should reassure everyone, and the battery life even exceeds that of iPhone 16 Plus. However, no matter how much the iPhone optimizes the power consumption, it is indeed difficult to run over the domestic models with crazy battery capacity. It is still difficult to make up for the physical gap, but in the field of small-screen iPhone, it can be said to be far ahead.

    So with the increase in the battery, has the charging efficiency of the iPhone 16e changed? We also directly look at the complete charging curve. The total time of 0-100 is 1 hour and 45 minutes, and the peak power is about 23 watts. Compared with the peak 45 watts upgraded on 16, the speed of the first 50% will be slower, but Apple also gave the previous relatively fast charging, but the full time has reached the beginning of 100 minutes.

    Portrait

    After reading the performance, what are the differences between the single-camera combat 16e and the standard version in terms of image? This time, the iPhone 16e is equipped with a fusion camera with 48 million pixels, 26 mm focal length and f1.6 aperture. Compared with the standard version, which cuts the ultra-wide angle, the most intuitive effect is the portrait mode. 16e can only calculate the depth of field through algorithms, and can only be used to shoot people. If you turn on the milk Tea shop, take a picture of milk tea, it won’t come out.

    Judging from the actual portrait, first of all, the iPhone 16e relies on pure algorithmic keying, and the calculation effect at the edge of the hair is not so accurate, while the standard version of 16 can achieve relatively complete character recognition, and the physical depth of field effect is also more obvious. In terms of facial details, it is more accurate to be a set of 16 samples, and the skin color is also more well-proportioned and pleasing.

    One ultra-wide angle is missing. In addition to affecting the portrait mode, macro shooting, movie mode and motion mode cannot be supported together. Not to mention the accuracy of Cook’s knife, one less camera, the image function directly opens the gap between the three generations.

    At the same time, the only camera of the iPhone 16e also cuts off the sensor displacement and anti-shake, and according to physical comparison, the module size is also smaller than that of the iPhone 16. Will this shorten the exposure time and reduce the amount of light in? Let’s take a look at the night sample first.

    As our judgment is the same as our judgment, the brightness of the night screen of the iPhone 16e is not as good as that of the other two, and the ground texture details are also slightly lacking. Observing the traffic light, we can see that the iPhone 16 still has better tolerance.

    Under the dark video scene, there is no difference in quality between the static picture 16e and 16 and 15 at a glance, but in the motion state, it can be seen that the iPhone 16 and iPhone 15 with sensor anti-shake are better than the iPhone 16e overall performance.

    Judging from the daytime sample, the style of 16e still implements Apple’s sense of reality. Under the condition of sufficient light, it is not much different from the overall 16, but in terms of dark information retention, the larger iPhone 16 will be better.

    After switching to 2 times the fusion algorithm, there is no obvious difference between the overall detail performance and 16, but under the overall comparison, due to the difference in the amount of light, the iPhone 16e will be less accurate in color control, and the picture will be yellow.

    There are not many points that can be dug deep in this camera. On the whole, it is one and a half generations worse than the iPhone 16. There is no castration of 2 times the sensor cut straight out, which also gives the single-camera model a telephoto composition. At the same time, compared with the Android competitors in this price segment, everyone is pursuing LivePhoto. Anyway, the iPhone 16e is still native LivePhoto, which will be better than Android in terms of animation support on some social media.

    More conscientiously, the front camera of the 16e is not castrated, and it is also a 12-megapixel sensor, which supports the portrait effect of autofocus and depth-of-view control. The straight style is no different from that of 15 and 16. Users of Xiaohongshu who like iPhone selfies can rest assured.

    Purchase recommendation

    Finally, let’s talk about the purchase recommendation. For the price of 128GB and 4,000 yuan, if you don’t plan to fight in the future, then the current experience, iPhone 15 is indeed better, and there are more colors to choose from. However, after all, Alibaba has also confirmed the cooperation of Apple AI recently, and iOS 18.4 is about to support Chinese AI, which is likely to be officially launched in China.

    At that time, iPhone 16e can use Apple AI and continue to be supported by AI functions in the future, so iPhone 15 users can only look at it. I think using AI to distinguish is also Cook’s smartest knife. Secondly, the A18 chip with native 8GB memory, if you plan to use it for 2-3 years, the future system support may be smoother. Of course, the most important point is that if you value battery life, the iPhone 16e is currently the iPhone with the best battery life under the lightest premise.

    Of course, at the end of the 16e press conference, the official also mentioned that there is a more favorable price in the channel chamber of commerce. Presumably, this pricing leaves a lot of room for the channel. If it can be sold below 3500 in the dealer in the future, I think it is very likely to become the next iPhone XR. After all, “the lower the price, the edge The precedent of “the narrower the frame” is still there, and in the future, the iPhone 16e may also “the lower the price, the smoother the game”.

    The above is the whole content of this issue. If it is helpful to you, welcome to like, comment and forward it to the friends around you. This is the evaluation of Huangjia. See you next time